You have a nice profile and a beautiful family but..... “she probably wasn’t being paid to show them that day anyway”..was a bit uncharitable, in the christian sense.
:)
How kind of you to point that out.
Perhaps ... but it was suggested by the picture leading the thread, as well as myriad others regularly shown. Of course, she might pull her blouse down on magazine covers for free ... I wouldn't know.
I don’t think Tax-chick was being uncharitable at all. If a woman is going to pose for a picture (that is obviously meant to be sexual in nature) then why not call it what it is?