Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raybbr

You are wrong. Breasts are secondary sexual characteristics meant to attract the makle.

Why shouldn’t I be able to breastfeed off of a willing woman in public? If it isn’t sexual, as YOU say it isn’t, then there can be nothng wrong with it.

You have just proven my case for me doofus.


61 posted on 12/29/2011 5:29:22 PM PST by SonofReagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: SonofReagan
You are wrong. Breasts are secondary sexual characteristics meant to attract the makle.

YOU are wrong. Do other mammals look at breasts in order to choose a mate? My personal taste virtually excludes the breasts when choosing a woman I like. In fact, I prefer smaller breasts.

Why shouldn’t I be able to breastfeed off of a willing woman in public? If it isn’t sexual, as YOU say it isn’t, then there can be nothng wrong with it.

Because the purpose of breastfeeding is to support the infant who cannot feed himself. Your rationale is infantile so therefor it would seem okay for you to breastfeed in public.

You have just proven my case for me doofus.

Well, some things have been proven in our conversation. Mostly, you have serious issues regarding a woman's breasts and your inability to delineate between sexuality and the nurturing of a child.

65 posted on 12/29/2011 5:44:42 PM PST by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson