Yep. And that's what worries me. One has better presentation skills, the other has better hair.
Worries me too. Dont know if I could pull the lever for Gingrich. After last election I vowed “Never Again”.
It would worry me if true, but the facts don't match the assertion. Newt talks liberal far too often, but he governs 90% conservative and is effective at that. Romney talks conservative when running for office, but he governs from the very far left. I'll trust their actions and assume Newt's record in Congress is a true representation of his values, and that RomneyCare and big government are a true representation of Mitt.
Romney is well known for pandering to the Left. He did that his entire Gubernatorial career in Mass. He chose extreme Liberal Circuit Court judges and thumbed his nose at the good Conservatives who he also had to choose from. Romney picked the Liberals to keep the Democrats in his state happy.
Romney has also admittedly said in Liberal Press interviews recently, that he will “reach across the isle” and find “common ground” with Liberals and Democrats. (Romney's favorite word is “Progressive”)
But in all of the ads in Iowa, on FOX, etc, Romney claims he is NOTHING but “CONservative”. He will “balance” the budget. He also says he will “cut” spending, which is Romney double speak for “reduce the amount of spending” but still exceed deficit spending.
And will Romney reduce taxes? Absolutely not. He will increase them like he did in Massachusetts to pay for his cloned rendition of Obamacare, AKA Romneycare.
And as far as Newt? his career and actual record is a complete opposite of Romney. And all these fools here who claim the opposite have never really researched Newt but lie and say they have. Because if they truly would have they would understand how much good Newt has done for the Conservative cause in his career. As President. Newt will be honest and will listen to the Conservative agenda, because Newt has lived the Reagan years and has first hand experience in how to make that happen again.