[WilliamHouston]

I have no intention of voting for Ron Paul. I disagree with his immigration policy. I dislike his stance on DADT and his libertarian position on various other issues.

OTOH, I respect his stances on several other major issues, namely his unwillingness to start costly, destructive, and unprovoked foreign wars (see Iraq or Vietnam or Serbia) which cost thousands of lives and trillions of dollars.

I can’t think of any redeeming virtue possessed by Newt Gingrich that would give me a reason to vote for him. At least with Ron Paul, we know for certain that he will oppose frivolous foreign wars and curtail government spending, and the neocons will be shut out of power.

[BCrago66]

Thanks for an honest answer, and I should say it’s classy of you not to respond in kind to my taunts.

[John D]

At least with Ron Paul, we know for certain that he will oppose frivolous foreign wars and curtail government spending, and the neocons will be shut out of power.

Still on the bong aren't you. If you were sober you would know the surrender monkey is not going to do anything to curtail government spending. Cut and Run has been in Washington for over a quarter century and what has he ever done to curtail government spending? He knows how to bring home the bacon, with all the earmarks he acquires, but that in no way is curtailing government spending. He talks much, accomplishes nothing.