Posted on 12/27/2011 2:54:17 PM PST by TBBT
Newt Gingrich on Tuesday lit into Ron Paul over extremist newsletters he once published, saying that he would not vote for him if he were the Republican nominee.
Asked by CNNs Wolf Blitzer about tough attack ads Paul has been running against him, Gingrich slammed his rival, who he said disowns ten years of his own letter, says he doesnt really realize what was in it, had no idea that he was making money on, that it was racist, anti-Semitic.
Hes attacking me for serial hypocrisy and he spent ten years out of earning money off a newsletter that had his name that he didnt notice, he said. Hes got to come up with some very straight answers to get somebody to take him seriously. Would I be willing to listen to him? Sure. I think the choice of Ron Paul or Barack Obama would be a very bad choice for America.
Gingrich flatly said no when asked if he would vote for Paul himself.
There will come a morning people wont take him as a serious person, Gingrich said, saying he was a reasonable candidate as a protest vote.
As a potential president, a person who thinks the United States was [responsible] for 9/11, a person who believes, who wrote in his newsletter, that the World Trade Center bombing in 1993 might have been a CIA plot, the person who says it doesnt matter if the Iranians have a nuclear weapon you look at Ron Pauls record of systemic avoidance of reality, his ads are about as accurate as his newsletter.
(Excerpt) Read more at 2012.talkingpointsmemo.com ...
I wouldn’t vote for Paul either, EVER.
Paul is a lunatic that would get us all killed.
I’m a bit confused by your statement which includes ‘classical liberals’ in the set of all liberals.
I thought that Thomas Jefferson was what is thought of today as a “classical liberal’ and he was not like the typical progressive liberals of today.
Regarding your contention #2,perhaps I have been sadly mistaken in thinking that both liberty and equality are basic principles or as you put it values, of liberalism rather than Conservatism.
If liberty and equality are liberal values rather than conservative,I ask that you or someone else respond and tell me straightforwardly what then are the basics of Conservatism?
Good gosh,I mean basic conservative rather than liberal values when we speak of liberty and equality. I do not see those as liberal values.
“Judging by the degenerate state of contemporary America (where liberty and equality have been taken to unimaginable extremes), it is clear they were right.”
Would you agree that part of the trouble might be that the definitions of “liberty” and “equality” have often been grossly distorted in our present time?
Newt: “I Would Never Vote For Ron Paul.”
Me neither, Newt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.