and the ADL? that is who were are defending now in an attempt to smear Paul?
Oh, c'mon. None of this should bother you, because Ron Paul never read any of this newsletter than had his name and photo it, that contained the first-person stories about his wife and son, the first-person stories about his congressional colleagues, the first-person medical advice from a physician, the first-person investment advice, the first-person advice on how to avoid government wiretaps on your militia phones, the charges that Jimmy Carter and George Bush were part of a government Trilateralist New World Order Conspiracy, that the Massad was responsible for the first World Trade Center bombing, saying that if New York City was named after blacks it should be called "Zooville," that you could get AIDs from kissing somebody because it's transmitted through the skin, or any of that normal stuff.
Because nobody in the news media's going to ambush him asking things about how he gave information about how to buy unregistered guns or how to kill youth and disposed of guns after wiping them off - or about how he made a million a year letting nuts writing this stuff under his name and photo for two decades, without apology.
I didn't know you were campaigning for Obama. I'm sorry. I was operating on a different premise. Because goodness knows, there's no way in the world anybody could be elected defending all of the sound bites, media interviews, debate points and stuff that comes from these newsletters and no doubt the crap he said in all of those interviews with the various truther radio and anti-Semite broadcasters. Not to mention all of the neo-Nazi and KKK donations and rallies he accepted in 2008.
The guy's past is a cesspool. And he's nuts. We'll just have to disagree.