[VinL]

We have to be careful here, lest we set a precedent that could undermine our efforts on Voter ID.

**************8
My Life, many are arguing this notion of Voter ID— and that's proper but not relevant here.

The argument to the Court is— plaintiffs agree that only verified Virginia voters get to sign a petition. But, the current verification process is wholly flawed, and may well be undermining the legitimate intent of Virginia citizens. Therefore, we ask for one week's time to amend our petition, so as to provide the requisite verification that existing signatures are in fact valid. We see no harm to any party in allowing this short time to fulfill a lawful intent- to verify the will of the petitioning citizen, and his right to do so.

[mylife]

I was just thinking out loud.
I agree that there should be a legal challenge to allow a fair chance to rectify any discrepancy’s

[PapaNew]

argument to the Court...we ask for one week's time to amend our petition, so as to provide the requisite verification that existing signatures are in fact valid.

Is there any evidence that Newt & his campaign will take this tack?