Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the invisib1e hand
If it were, there’d be a reason to fight. Instead, what we have is a passive-aggressive nanny state.

That's the plan - lull us into non-action until they can finally overcome that pesky Constitutional right to bear arms. If that ever occurs, you can expect the widespread, out-in-the-open, tactics to begin.

11 posted on 12/24/2011 6:02:05 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: trebb
"...until they can finally overcome that pesky Constitutional right to bear arms."

But we only have the right to bear arms as long as five of nine politically appointed lawyers agree that we have that right.

26 posted on 12/24/2011 8:09:48 AM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: trebb

We need to have rally points for if the S ever HTF.


57 posted on 12/24/2011 8:12:17 PM PST by ichabod1 (Mr Newt? Mr. Perry~! Mr. Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson