Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Duke’s Victory (Ron Paul praises David Duke 1990)
Ron Paul Survival Report (scanned links in body of thread)

Posted on 12/23/2011 5:30:26 PM PST by mnehring

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: Pikachu_Dad
If you don't see a problem with helping hide who Duke is and helping trick the world that the wolf isn't a wolf because he is wearing sheep's clothing, you have some serious issues. Maybe you are a David Duke fan for a reason?


81 posted on 12/24/2011 9:13:12 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Or this paragraph.

“Kempocrisy

Liberal Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) recently pointed out that Jack Kemp’s 27-person public affairs office is spending its time on Kemp’s next campaign instead of HUD.

Mikulski, chairman of the appropriations subcommittee that oversees HUD, deleted the funding to cries of anguish from Kemp. Undoubtedly it will be restored, but I still enjoyed the whole thing.”


82 posted on 12/24/2011 9:14:45 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Ron Paul Pictures, Images and Photos
83 posted on 12/24/2011 9:14:45 AM PST by madmaximus (Anyone But Robamney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

So you are a fan of Democrat Senator Barbara Mikulski now and support HUD?

Are you sure you are on the right forum. First supporting David Duke, then supporting a Democrat Senator, then supporting HUD?


84 posted on 12/24/2011 9:17:42 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

or the final paragraph posted.

“U.N. Tyranny

I recently visited a Congressional friend involved in foreign affairs, and he told me that the administration may push

— end of page 4 —”

That was the sum total of the text for the two pages posted from the newsletter, which was at least 5 pages long.


85 posted on 12/24/2011 9:17:52 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Have a Merry Christmas.

I am off to visit family.

I have read the two pages that you posted. I don’t think the weight of the paper supports the claims you are making against Ron Paul.

I prefer to see accurate claims made, not hyperbolic claims.


86 posted on 12/24/2011 9:23:47 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Actually, that last one really says a lot. If you remember, Kemp was attempting to greatly overhaul and reform HUD, reducing it in size and scope and the Democrats, led by Mikulski, were attacking him.

It says a lot about Ron Paul if he sided with the Democrats here due to his hatred of Republicans.


87 posted on 12/24/2011 9:25:43 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

I see you are playing the game of intentional misunderstanding. This post is about, “The Duke’s Victory” section of the newsletter.


88 posted on 12/24/2011 10:37:19 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

I’m not here to cheer on Ron Paul, but its sad that we have to choose between him and business as usual Republicans like Romney and Newt.

A lot of good people were elected in the wave that brought Newt to the speaker’s position.

But his Contract With America did not say flat out that government power and size would be reduced.

One part I remember was that the government rules and regulations would apply to Congress like everyone else.

The real issue is the government rules and regulations in the first place, not who they apply to.


89 posted on 12/24/2011 11:25:11 AM PST by Nextrush (President Sarah Palin sounds just right to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I’d rather be a Paultard than a goose-stepper.


90 posted on 12/24/2011 12:21:52 PM PST by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

Then go be one. Don’t let the door hit ya.


91 posted on 12/24/2011 12:29:19 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso
“...rather be a Paultard than a goose-stepper.”

A distinction without a difference.

92 posted on 12/24/2011 12:33:12 PM PST by decal (I'm not rude, I don't suffer fools is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Fortunately, I don’t have to choose.


93 posted on 12/24/2011 1:08:26 PM PST by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
Only because he tried to run as a Republican. If he was a Democrat he'd be fine, like Sen. Byrd.
Unlike Byrd or Wallace, Duke never repudiated his past. He revels in it.
94 posted on 12/24/2011 3:45:39 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

90% of the black vote for David Duke? In a GOP primary, sure.


95 posted on 12/24/2011 5:17:04 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (Diplomacy is war by other means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston
Is FR for affirmative action, welfare, and forced busing now?

Where'd that silly question come from?



Where there's a shell, there's a way.

25 years ago, we had Ronald Reagan, Johnny Cash, and Bob Hope.
Today we have Obama, no cash, and no hope!

If you can't appreciate the pure beauty of the violin after hearing this, something's wrong with your ears.

Or you can get raw with these strings.

How about this gamechanger from America's Got Talent (which they SHOULD have won).

Either way, the violin is sweet yet lethal.

Do it!

96 posted on 12/24/2011 6:00:46 PM PST by rdb3 (><>The mouth is the exhaust pipe of the heart. <><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Figment
How do you know that Paul is the author of those recent writings?

I'm the fellow who said that Jack Cashill should look into the matter.

97 posted on 12/24/2011 6:26:01 PM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
I guess you missed the part where he cheered ‘scaring the blazes out of the establishment’ and saying he made good sense

Not really, but apparently you don't understand the sentence containing the reference to good sense:

"Duke’s platform called for tax cuts, no quotas, no affirmative action, no welfare, and no busing. “Tonight, we concede the election, “ he said. “But we will never concede our fight for equal rights for all Americans.”

To many voters, this seems like just plain good sense. Duke carried baggage from his past, but the voters were willing to overlook that."

The sentence containing the phrase "plain good sense" refers back to the sentence on Duke's platform of tax cuts, no quotas, no affirmative action, no welfare, and no busing. It obviously doesn't refer to Duke himself, or Duke's racist views, characterized as "baggage from his past" which the article indicates those who voted for him were willing to overlook due to their approval of the ideas in his platform.

Do you consider tax cuts racist? Do you think advocating an end to quotas and affirmative action is racist? Do you think Ward Churchill is a racist? Is ending or reducing welfare racist? Do you think Bill Clinton is a racist? Do you think busing is a good idea? Few conservatives would say "yes" to any more than one of those questions.

You obviously don't like Ron Paul, and that is an opinion you are certainly entitled to share. But arguing that some article which states that an endorsement of a platform of ideas like cutting taxes and ending affirmative action quotas is "plain good sense" is evidence of racism plays right into the hand of the most ardent liberal who sees every conservative political idea as racist.

Put more simply, if the Republican party advocated cutting taxes, reducing welfare, and ending affirmative action and quotas, would that make them a racist organization?

98 posted on 12/24/2011 6:52:18 PM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing

Apparently you fell for the wolf in sheep’s clothing too. Just because he claimed to stand for those things doesn’t change who he was or what he really stood for. They were window dressing and Paul was empowering him.

It is as bogus as the BNP saying their only goal is reduce crime.

I would suggest reading Goethe’s Faust sometime.


99 posted on 12/24/2011 7:53:59 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
They were window dressing and Paul was empowering him.

That is a nonsensical argument. Paul is not endorsing or supporting Duke in the article, he is commenting on how apparently the voters - including 9% of the African Americans who voted - chose to hold their noses and vote for Duke based on the identified portions of his platform in spite of Duke's "baggage".

The article is really arguing that voters supported a certain set of ideas often associated with conservatives and libertarians, such as cutting taxes and ending quotas in spite of the odious nature of the particular candidate.

100 posted on 12/24/2011 8:35:36 PM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson