Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EDINVA
Newt likes to claim credit for a lot of things he didn't do. He is an idea man, not a manager or executive. It was one of the reasons the members forced him out. He was also the only sitting speaker to receive a reprimand. The ethics committee voted 7-1 to reprimand him and fine him $300,00. The House voted 395-28 to uphold that recommendation with 90% of the Reps supporting the reprimand.

It remains to be seen what kind of ground game he can organize and how much money he can raise. His profligate spending on himself on the campaign trail is not exactly what donors like to see.

317 posted on 12/23/2011 8:10:43 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

Please stop spreading dishonest Romney spin.

Newt wasn’t “forced out,” he resigned after the Repubs lost a handful of seats in 1998.

The ethics investigations happened years before that and had nothing to do with it. Nancy Pelosi was on the committee. He was reprimanded based on one trumped-up charge and voluntarily agreed to pay 300,000 to cover costs of the investigation. All the charge said was that he taught a college class that promoted Republicans. The IRS then investigated that charge and found Newt not guilty of anything.

The investigation was a political witchhunt. Of course everyone voted to reprimand him because you can never lose by accusing a congressman of corruption with the public, whether it’s true or not.


328 posted on 12/23/2011 8:29:36 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson