“Looks like Corsi has already explained this.”
I, for one, am not buying that explanation. In fact, I see where the blogger addressed that in her post. She pointed out that Corsi linked to the Evening Standard, and even included citations to it.
WND’s explanation that they were snookered by Kenyans (who Corsi claimed were “trusted Kenyan professionals” and people he’s worked with since 2008), doesn’t add up. It means that Corsi read the Evening Standard article in order to excerpt the portions he cited, and completely missed all the other parts of their article that he was copying exactly.
See ya.
Joining a conservative web site, then, within ten days posting a specious argument about a conservative writer shows lack of judgement, and leads one to question your motives.
Yes, Corsi is controversial, but well worth listening to.
He was among the first to ring the bells about Obumbo’s
questionable birth story, which still looks most suspicious,
with the release of a new and obviously fraudulent birth certificate.
As for you, son, you should consider the wise saying, paraphrasing, of course:
Better to be thought a fool, then to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt.