You get caught in a lie and then accuse me of smearing you? I ask you again, simply provide proof of your accusation that, like Romney, Newt would be Sodomite friendly? Everything I read says otherwise. Enlighten me.
I said Newt is sodomite friendly in the context of saying that he is unlikely to repeal the repeal of DADT. Is English your first language?
As for what you have read, do you understand that all Newt has said he would do is have a “review” of the policy. If he really were serious, he wouldn’t call for a “review”. There is nothing to review.
Do you understand the difference between saying he would call for a “review” and saying that he would repeal the repeal of DADT? Perhaps this will help: In politician speak, “review” means “I’m not going to do anything, but if it makes you rubes feel better, I’ll say I’ll have it reviewed”.
Perhaps he really will have it reviewed - the next time he is sitting on the sofa with Pelosi.