Posted on 12/19/2011 9:59:22 AM PST by jazusamo
Excellent point. Thanks for stating it! It confirms my conviction that between Obama and Romney, Romney is the GREATER of the two evils.
Thanks for the post.
Good article. We are going with Newt.
>> Are you being sarcastic? >>
HINT: Dr. Thomas Sowell would be able to figure it out all by himself.
Those people want pretty picture perfection, and think that’s all that it’s going to take.
Getting rid of Obama isnt high on their priority list.
You earned it, spammer. YOU should be very proud on the day that Obama takes the prize.
"Newt is a pro-life Reaganite."
-Jim Robinson
“Getting rid of Obama isnt high on their priority list.”
Agreed... and neither is saving our country.
Dr. Sowell's insight reminds us that the liberties of millions yet unborn may rely on whether Americans can rediscover the essential ideas and concepts of 1776 and 1787.
At no time in America's history have those ideas been more threatened, more under attack, and more ignored by leaders in all branches of government.
Thanks to those citizens who rose up in what came to be known as a Taxed Enough Already Movement, more citizens, using new technologies to access the Founders' writings, are becoming informed about their nation's fundamental principles.
At this critical time, who better to lead us, warts and all, than a historian who actually has read and understands the underlying reasons why our liberties rely on Creator-endowed life, liberty and laws to protect them?
More contemporary ideas dealing with jobs and other mere "issues" are not enough to turn the tide of coercive power and control by government, no matter how compassionate or benevolent those who advocate them, may seem.
When Americans return to that one basic understanding of the Source of life, liberty and law, and the Founders' formula for self-government under "We, the People," freedom, opportunity, prosperity, progress and plenty will, in all likelihood, take care of themselves.
bttt
Priceless!
Gingrich is certainly better than Romney or Obama. The real question is "the alternatives actually available". I see Perry, Bachmann, and Santorum as preferable alternatives to Gingrich.
If I gave a crap on how wrong you are - I would bookmark your goofy tagline and waive it in your face (Nyah-nyah-nyaaahhhh) when Sarah Palin endorses Mitt Romney.
Cause THAT will be funny to see.
Yeah. He has.
SO GLAD for the Mark Steyn link.
PLEASE can you post it as its own thread? Especially in light of his former stance.
I posted my two cents on this matter last week, but unfortunately I was backed against the clock having to go offline to free up the telephone for incoming calls, and wasn’t quite as eloquent in the manner I wrote my thoughts, thus the commentary was pulled by moderator, and rightfully so I might say.
I was ticked off at those that want to place our Nation at risk discounting Mr. Gingrich as candidate for POTUS due to some indiscretions of which he has acknowledged with regrets over the years opposed to his vast experience at a time the experience is what we need in the leadership of this country. Experience that is lacking in each, and every single one of the other candidates, and yes even Rick Perry.
Much, but most certainly not all of the negatives we have been subjected to by various sources are disinformation from the war the Left waged against Mr. Gingrich back in the ‘90’s, and many believe those terrible lies especially the one about the hospital visit to his previous wife allegedly dying of cancer, and him wanting to discuss the divorce. It was BS. She lives. It was an operation to remove a benign tumor, and there was no discussion of divorce as reported by their daughter Jackie Gingrich Cushman who was there at the visit with her mom, and her dad.
THAT type of disinformation about Newt Gingrich is rampant on the internet, and is still promoted by his Leftist enemies.
He ain’t no Saint, but he IS a viable, and very qualified by experience leader with the credentials of his past history to prove that.
Thanks for the ping jaz.
I am going with the person I want to be president in the primary, regardless of how “electable” he or she is. After the primary, it no longer matters who I wanted. I will have a choice of two. I will vote AGAINST the person who will destroy this country the quickest. Any one who does not do that supports Obama.
Romney built a career on tricking democrats into voting for a republican..
NOW hes tricking republicans to vote for him before he caves to the democrats..
Romney “IS” the democrats secret weapon..
OK OK.. its not so secret anymore..
It has been posted before. I wouldn’t know Steyn’s “former stance.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.