I was the first, if not one of the first to post the Bloomberg stories when it first came out. I hope you read it: the Freddie Mac officials state they hired Gingrich to de facto lobby Republican members of Congress.
Besides, post #7 doesn’t address my point to you at all.
My question is this: would you dismiss Gingrich’s activities if he had done, or not done, EXACTLY the same thing as a consultant for Planned Parenthood instead of for Freddie Mac?
What’s your answer to that, please?
Would you say, “so what, he didn’t do much if anything for Planned Parenthood, he earned only chump change from Planned Parenthood, maybe he even took Planned Parenthood’s money in order to tell Planned Parenthood stuff they didn’t to hear!”?
Whats your answer to that, please?
"Or not done"..?
I'm having a little difficulty making sense of your question, but I will say thay if Gingrich had lobbied on behalf of Planned Parenthood, then OF COURSE I would dismiss him. I think you're trying to make a point, but damn if I can figure out what it is.
If Newt took Planned Parenthood's money and then told them to go pound sand, I would applaud.