[Norseman]

>>So you prefer canned propaganda and not candor, give & take, flying by the seat of Constitutional scholarship?<<

I’d prefer to think there’s more than your two options, which is obvious, and yes, I’d prefer a candidate who had a bit (hell, a lot more) discipline than Gingrich. He is so full of himself, it’s ridiculous. Make him President for four years, put him and Obama in a room together, and they’d soon be arguing who was the fourth best President of all time. (I’m assuming they’d defer to Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln, though I’m not sure Gingrich wouldn’t shoot for slot number three.)

>>You believe that judges have unlimited power under the Constitution - to make law instead of interpreting the laws established by Congress and signed by the President?<<

I don’t think I said anything about judicial power, other than inferring that the 9th circuit is rogue, which is true. I just pointed out that this foray into unnecessary territory was foolish, and it’s likely to be misinterpreted.

>>Newt is addressing the conundrum of activist judges by listing remedies - which the elite don’t want you to know.<<

Maybe, but Newt is also sticking his neck out for no good reason, and he’s likely to suffer the consequences yet again.

[sodpoodle]

***Newt is also sticking his neck out for no good reason***

Newt is testing the electorate’s response to multiple issues - in the primaries. This is good strategy - taking a stand based on Constitutional isses and American values.

When he takes office as President - no one can say “that’s not what we expected”. The Congress is on notice.