Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fake Withdrawal? 'US won't leave Iraq oil to Iran'
YouTube ^ | 12/18/11 | Russia Today

Posted on 12/18/2011 9:14:30 AM PST by Nachum

Despite the US's declared withdrawal of its military personnel and contractors out of Iraq, Washington has prepared to control the country's rich oil reserves in any case, shared Ranjit Singh Kalha, former India's ambassador to Iraq in the 1990s. ­Having spent $3 trillion in Iraq, a country with harsh weather conditions (+50 C most of the time) and absolutely nothing valuable but oil reserves, the Americans simply cannot give up the plentiful and very high quality oil they went there for. "It takes $1.50 to take out this oil that's just below the surface. Anybody who has access to this oil can be a game changer -- as far as the politics of oil is concerned," Ranjit Singh Kalha concluded. The problem Americans encountered in Iraq is that once given "some symbols" of democracy, the Iraqi voted for a Shia-led government. The headache is that the Shia traditionally have close links with Iran, the core territory of this affiliation.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fake; iraq; iraqoil; oil; withdrawal
Vid at link

Russia Today is mostly propaganda, but the video brings up some good points.

1 posted on 12/18/2011 9:14:43 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com


2 posted on 12/18/2011 9:16:11 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Russia Today is mostly propaganda

As if CNN/NBC/CBS/MSNBC, et. al. aren't?

3 posted on 12/18/2011 9:16:39 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Mostly propaganda indeed. Russia and their buddy China are who have the Iraq oil contracts.


4 posted on 12/18/2011 9:16:39 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I was under the impression that U.S. oil companies didn’t get any of that Iraqi oil. I think the biggest player is China, followed by France.

I found a recent article in the NYTimes, which tries to say that the U.S. is the big beneficiary. But evidently Russia, China, and Europe are getting almost all the oil. Halliburton and a few American companies are doing some of the work on site, drilling and pumping.

No doubt the NYTimes is eager to keep pushing the “No blood for oil” mantra, so if anything they probably exaggerate U.S. interests. And Russia Today may be underplaying Russia’s involvement.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/business/energy-environment/15iht-srerussia15.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all


5 posted on 12/18/2011 9:22:33 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I won’t waste my time on any comments, other then to state the obvious. POTUS Barack Hussein Obama has, with his own design and destructive plans to destroy the American nation, has handed Iraq over to Iran In fact, that statement can be expanded to: POTUS Barack Hussein Obama has handed the entire Middle East & North Africa to his brethren in Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan and the love of his heart, The Muslim Brotherhood. End of story!!! Yes, Americans, the truth sometimes hurts, but....the truth is still the truth!!!


6 posted on 12/18/2011 9:27:25 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Oh yes. We are sucking out as much oil as we can. It was our blood and treasure that kept the oil wells in our hands. If Obama gives that away, he won’t survive in office for a month.


7 posted on 12/18/2011 9:30:18 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

US won’t leave Iraqi oil to Iran,

nor Canadian oil to China...


8 posted on 12/18/2011 9:36:49 AM PST by null and void (Day 1063 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yeah. that would be as stupid and career limiting as promising to veto any bill that funds the Keystone XL pipeline.


9 posted on 12/18/2011 9:39:08 AM PST by null and void (Day 1063 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Hey, the Obama Administration already has secured Iraqi oil. Obama looked the other way when the Iraqi oil agency granted most oil rights in Iraq to companies run or controlled by Red China. The US won’t get much oil from the new Iraq. We better approve that Keystone pipeline or we won’t even get oil from good neighbor Canada.


10 posted on 12/18/2011 10:12:13 AM PST by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Thanks for posting this vid. It does bring up some interesting points.

With or without RT’s perspective or this envoy’s perspective, surely no one believes that we are absolutely withdrawing from Iraq.


11 posted on 12/18/2011 10:14:36 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson