No you missed it.
Obama = enemy
RINOmney = supposed friend who will stab you in the back.
Better an enemy you can oppose than an untrustworthy “friend.”
But as I wrote earlier, you get one vote. Use it as you wish.
Just don’t come back here complaining about your “friend” when
he takes the mask off.
We’ll laugh at your foolishness in having believed in him.
Mitt wants to be POTUS so much that if you told him it required
being the first women POTUS, he’d have already had the surgery.
Obama = enemy You've established this and we agree.
RINOmney = supposed friend who will stab you in the back. Here's where you begin to lose rationality. When you say, "supposed friend who will stab you in the back" you're really saying, "known enemy". That is you've already defined Romney as an enemy and a tactic once understood is no longer a tactic. Do you follow that so far?
Now the real equation is:
Obama = enemy
Romney = supposed friend who will stab you in the back = enemy
Obama = enemy = Romney.
Now you are an anti-Mormon bigot which is why this doesn't seem clear or rational to you. Bigotry does that to the rational mind, hence the irrationality of bigotry. Now I don't expect you to understand this, so have someone who's not an anti-Mormon bigot, but who you trust and see as rational explain this to you before replying again. Do you know someone like that who can help you?