If someone has a better idea than Newt for reigning in the judiciary, I’d like to hear it.
The usual approach to reign in the judiciary is to pass a law defining the matters the appeals court used incorrectly. That removes the precedent. The last thing is an amendment.
In between one can impeach judges. Congress can also establish limits on subjects to be reviewed by the courts.
Those are the constitutional methods.
I'd rein the judiciary in, like I would a horse, not allow it to reign like a king as it presently does. But Newt's plan agrees with mine. FYI, reign and rein are homophones (words that sound the same but have entirely different meanings).