>> I would love to see a debate between Mark and Rush. Getting into details Mark would crush Rush. >>
Hmm, interesting post. Not sure what it has to do with this subject or why you brought it up.
Not sure they ever disagree on enough to have a meaningful debate. Not sure “details” win debates over big picture arguments.
And with respects to the trashing of Newt by many GOP estabishment types, Mark and Rush are of like mind. So out of curiosity, where were you going with this?
>> I would love to see a debate between Mark and Rush. Getting into details Mark would crush Rush. >>
Hmm, interesting post. Not sure what it has to do with this subject or why you brought it up.
Not sure they ever disagree on enough to have a meaningful debate. Not sure “details” win debates over big picture arguments.>>>>
Rush covers the top of a subject and expects the listerner to understand where he is going. Mark takes his audience down into the depth of a subject matter. IMHO Mark’s audience is much more educated in politics than ‘El Rushbo’. Generally speaking. I listen to both.
And with respects to the trashing of Newt by many GOP estabishment types, Mark and Rush are of like mind. So out of curiosity, where were you going with this?