I agree.
It's Gingrich that they really fear, because he not only represents a threat to Obama, he represents a threat to liberalism itself.
Newt is the one firing and hitting the target. Newt is the only one who has said Chris Dodd and Barney Frank should go to jail. Newt is the one who says Obama is an "Alinsky radical". Newt is the one who said John Bolton would be his sec of state.
Newt is firing real bullets at liberalism. They fear him because he would keep Obama on the defensive, unlike Romney.
>>> It’s Gingrich that they really fear, because he not only represents a threat to Obama, he represents a threat to liberalism itself.
Newt is the one firing and hitting the target. Newt is the only one who has said Chris Dodd and Barney Frank should go to jail. Newt is the one who says Obama is an “Alinsky radical”. Newt is the one who said John Bolton would be his sec of state.
Newt is firing real bullets at liberalism. They fear him because he would keep Obama on the defensive, unlike Romney. >>>
Which is why I, after years of being alternately please with / very ticked off at Newt - have moved in his direction. For all of the great philosophy of MB and Rick Santorum and all of the great record of Rick Perry - and all of their great personal stories — all of which I like BTW — not one of them has the ability to level hard hitting logical to the point and off the cuff devastating fire on liberalism in general. They just do not have that ability and in this YouTube Debate Cable TV world - talking the talk is perhaps more important than walking the walk. This ability is so important. And, he used that ability to do some great things in the 80s and 90s.