Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeshark

“Her snits about Newt not being pro-life because he was for partial birth abortion (wtf was that all about if she’s not a bit loony?), plus her “I am a serious candidate who knows all the facts hissy fit showed very poorly.”

Gingrich has a near perfect rating in Congress on Life issues, so yeah, that made Bachmann look desperate. Her Failed flailing at her being a “serious candidate” was what a politician would do...anything to get elected.

What a joke that was, she was “factually incorrect” as Gingrich pointed out...and she defended her illogical argument with a bigger FAIL at “he attacked me because I’m a woman”. She’s always been a lightweight.


25 posted on 12/16/2011 6:24:04 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: rbmillerjr
Morning Joe saying this debate helped Bachmann simply proves what a horrid commentator he is. She came off on balance looking bad. When the crazy uncle in the attic looks better than you (and he was as crazy as normal last night), you've had a bad showing.

Santorum looked good (second time in a row), and other than his first mega jacked up answer, I thought Perry had his second decent performance in a row. Newt just keeps hitting them out of the park, he had his struggles last night, but overall he gave a creditable performance for a front runner defending his position.

28 posted on 12/16/2011 6:35:12 AM PST by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson