To: af_vet_rr
Wish Bachman would give it up as well. And yes; given time allotments; it should have been down to ‘two’. But then; maybe the ‘Media’ does not want to give more time; to the top tiered. Perhaps; for their purposes; ‘less time per candidate; is more, of what they want.
1,816 posted on
12/16/2011 6:39:30 PM PST by
cricket
(/get the 'Occupier' out of our White House!/ and Newt 'in'. . .and it is NOT just the economy!)
To: cricket
Wish Bachman would give it up as well. And yes; given time allotments; it should have been down to two. But then; maybe the Media does not want to give more time; to the top tiered. Perhaps; for their purposes; less time per candidate; is more, of what they want.
I'd be okay with Santorum and Huntsman being booted. Ideally we'd have four, but it's tricky because Bachmann and Perry are too close and one poll would see Perry in 4th, and the next would see Bachmann. Five would be an improvement.
What would really be an improvement is moderators who aren't trying to tear down candidates or encouraging candidates to tear down each other. We haven't gotten that in the last two debates - both the ABC and Fox News moderators were trying to tear down candidates or get other candidates to dogpile on the frontrunner.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson