Those 2 guys you’re arguing with are impenetrably stupid. I loved it when the one said he’d rather get into a wreck in a 67 Fairlane than a new car. Seat belts? Airbags? Padded interiors? Crumple zones? Nah, I don’t need them things, I ain’t no liberal sissy. Apparently he also thinks you can’t use a cell phone to call 911 if you need help. The other one thinks everything is a gubbmint plot to keep him from blabbering on his cell phone when he should be watching the road. At least they’ll be in jail or a grave pretty soon.
Well Ozzy you obviously lack reading skills don't you Bubba? Too many beers? I said 65 Fairlane equiped with some modern equipment like seatbelts, airbags and antilock brakes would be safer cars. What is wrong with that? Or do you just love your government Mandated new vehicle like a Smart Car? Would you put your familiy in one?
Second part IF you bothered to read is one poster did not want them in the occupied portiion of the vehicle at all but rather in a trunk locked up and turned off. You tell me Sherlock what good does it do in the trunk if you are pinned in a wreck off the road?