That might be true, but perhaps it’s better to select better cases than a pervert being engaged in dangerous sexual behavior to make a case for armed self defense. It doesn’t play very well in most parts.
I’ll tell you what case would be better with most people. How about a guy who has to defend himself from a gay co-worker who continually keeps hitting on him despite repeated rejection and being told the guy isn’t gay, who finally tries to rape the straight co-worker? Now that’s a case I’ll get on board with. Or realistically, a guy of lower rank in the military having to fight off a gay male superior who’s attempting to rape him. This happens all the time. that’s the guy who needs to be armed.
I'm not sure about you...but it rarely happens. There are more straights who hit on ladies at the work place. Come on...I don't like most of the gay's behavior, but neither does my gay friends.
being told the guy isn’t gay, who finally tries to rape the straight co-worker?
Did it ever happens?? If one of my employees ever try to RAPE anyone at work, I would FIRE the person and then I would press charges against the person. If it was after hours, I would have the person fired and see if the person would want to press charges.
This is my last statement on this subject. I believe that the constitution protects all... including GAYS -- with LIFE LIBERTY and HAPPINESS.