To: Arthurio
I’m gonna go with Dr Bill Wattenburg and say that the liklihood of a high altitude EMP detonation over the US is highly unlikely for a number of reasons, whereas the real danger lies in a nuke, low tech dirty bomb, or germs coming in through our porous ports and shipping traffic.
2 posted on
12/11/2011 10:52:47 PM PST by
SpaceBar
To: SpaceBar
whereas the real danger lies in a nuke, low tech dirty bomb, or germs coming in through our porous ports and shipping traffic. Thats my nightmare scenario. Nukes in shipping containers, half a dozen ports simultaneously.
The arabs would be the willing patsies and take the brunt of whatever vengeance we could muster, but otherwise we'd be side-lined for a generation. With us out of the picture or at the least our influence removed from the equation the rest of the world goes mad.
13 posted on
12/12/2011 12:06:57 AM PST by
marron
To: SpaceBar
Im gonna go with Dr Bill Wattenburg and say that the liklihood of a high altitude EMP detonation over the US is highly unlikely for a number of reasons, whereas the real danger lies in a nuke, low tech dirty bomb, or germs coming in through our porous ports and shipping traffic.
Well I hope you and Dr. Bill enjoy learning how to use a slide rule, go back to exclusively using paper, pen and pencil, and reading lots of books after the TV, radio and Internet go "pffft".
23 posted on
12/12/2011 3:31:20 AM PST by
mkjessup
(Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson