Do some of you people actually READ the articles before posting your expert commentary on them?
Or is it just another convenient opportunity to post “Joe knew!” “Shut the program down!!!” comments?
I’d say the latter.
Reading the article only slows them down.
McQueary’s story has problems. There are some contradictions. However, I think if Joe didn’t know, he didn’t want to know. Same difference in the end.
I’ve read every article I can get my hands on.
I’ve read the 23 page Grand Jury presentment.
I’ve read JoePa’s version of the events.
JoePa, by his own words, has revealed he was unwilling to simply pick up the phone and call the police.
As for this article?
MY BS detector is going haywire.
So the guy’s story is that McQueary described sex sounds. But he asks him 3 times if he saw anything sexual?
McQueary sees that a boy is in the shower alone with an adult male, who grabs the boy by the waist and pulls him back in.
And based on this, the guy advises McQueary not to call the police.
Unfreakingbelievable.