Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Van Doorn

The both of you have been using the word “secular” incorrectly. Secular is not religious.

Saddam Hussein ran a secular government over a nation comprised largely of Muslims. He used Muslims and Muslim terminology to further his ends. He was not himself Muslim and neither were his sons nor the upper echelons of his regime.

I’m not certain why this has turned into a lengthy circular debate, but it appears to have done so, and with this I’m getting off the merry-go-round because it’s pointless, regardless of whatever point you might have wished to make two days ago.

Have the last word, enjoy it and be done with it, please.


189 posted on 12/13/2011 12:28:10 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry
RegulatorCountry said, "Secular is not religious."

no wonder we are not communicating.
Secular means 'not religious'? We are not talking about the individual but the national policy. The national policy was to finance a Crusade against you and me. The nation didn't do a lot in terms of forcing Sharia up everyones butt

190 posted on 12/13/2011 1:32:54 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson