Hey, you can continue to vote for None of the Above and believe that is the the principled stand. And I will support the King David’s who are far from perfect but confess their sins and say they are changed men.
Such a stance is only “principled” if “none of the above” meet basic non-negotiable criteria, such as “will they keep the first obligation of their oath of office to equally protect the God-given, unalienable right to life of every innocent person in this country?” Which, sadly, is currently the case. Newt Gingrich, like all of his competitors, have already clearly told you that they won’t do so with their promises to sign lawless, unconstitutional “laws” that explicitly allow the murder of certain classes of disfavored innocent human beings.
I’m not buying Newt Gingrich as David any more than I bought your weak self-justifications for supporting pro-choice for states, “states’ rights trump unalienable rights” Ron Paul in the last election cycle.