And she didn't exactly "skip over it," did she?
I think some of these people go looking for opportunities to spew their bile and when they don't do their homework, they step in it.
Giving the rest of us a a good chuckle, of course. :-D
Seriously? did you not notice that the article was written by Rick Perry?
No, I didn’t notice really. Makes no difference. The Perries do use this tactic and it’s annoying.
Then why does post #1 have a bunch of spam links Perry's foriegn policy positions?
Seriously, did you not notice that the subject of the article was corruption in Washington (a domestic policy issue)?
Seriously, don't you think the original poster would have gotten more traction for Perry by using the #1 post to reinforce the message of Perry's article with something like "This is why we should support Perry, because he's serious about cleaning up Washington corruption", instead of diluting the message of the original article with a bunch of spam links?
And she didn't exactly "skip over it," did she?
I think some of these people go looking for opportunities to spew their bile and when they don't do their homework, they step in it.
Giving the rest of us a a good chuckle, of course. :-D