Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

Of all the players in this, I detest Colin Powell the most. He knew. KNEW. And KEPT HIS MOUTH SHUT. He could have picked up a phone and put and end to it.

But he didn’t. And by all that can be gleaned, he did it for personal, vindictive, political reasons.

As far as I am concerned, that undid every good thing Powell ever did for his country. Same as Benedict Arnold, who was a hero until he sold his country out.

Powell can rot in Hell.


20 posted on 12/08/2011 5:35:59 PM PST by rlmorel ("A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

Exactly. He’s a POS.


24 posted on 12/08/2011 5:55:06 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel
Amen...
31 posted on 12/08/2011 6:55:36 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Agreed. I can’t believe I once supported that scum. Shame on me.


33 posted on 12/08/2011 7:00:07 PM PST by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel
I think you are right in your assessment of Colin Powell. His disloyalty to the man who selected him as Secretary of State is inexplicable unless he bore a grudge (maybe because his public defense of Bush's Iraq policy displeased people he wanted to hob-nob with at Washington parties?).

Joe Wilson had fabricated a motive for the political people in the Bush White House (Bush, Cheney, Rove) to want to damage Valerie Plame, and Fitzgerald seems to have taken that as his starting point. Even if it were true it would be par for the course in Washington--remember that Clintonista (Bacon) who revealed Linda Tripp's arrest (she was the victim of a prank by some "friends" and the case was quickly thrown out, but making the arrest public knowledge damaged her public reputation).

Libby was found guilty because his memory didn't match Russert's memory--instead of reasoning that both men were doing their best to remember an obscure conversation and had conflicting recollections, Fitzgerald chose to believe Russert and assume the other man was lying.

It was clear from the comments made by the jury after the trial that they wanted to find someone guilty--they wanted someone higher up in the administration but found Libby guilty because that's all they had.

42 posted on 12/08/2011 7:29:59 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson