[Reagan69]

why doesn’t Newt just tell us what the ethics committee was investigating?
Oh it’s all coming out. No question about that.

If he is the nominee, we are so screwed.

35 posted on Monday, December 05, 2011 3:31:27 PM by Semper911

—— why don’t you google it. It’s like ancient history. He says in the clip that he was accused of 85 ethics violations (He was Palinized before Sarah was) and was cleared of all but one... which was an oversight on his part.

[Semper911]

— why don’t you google it. It’s like ancient history.

I don't need to Google it. I was a news junkey back then too, and I remember full well what happened. And I couldn't care less.

It doesn't matter what the facts are. Don't you see? The MSM will paint a picture of him that has nothing to do with the facts. They are already trying.

And the masses, who are not news junkies like us, will believe it. See also: Sarah Palin.

[Tail Gunner John]

Obviously many here don't remember the witch hunt the media, the clintonistas and that kangaroo court “ethics” committee put Newt through. Conservative radio, Fox news and the internet were in their infancy leaving Newt completely on his own. If anything, no one could be more vented against this crap than Newt.