Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver

The Dems are getting nervous. They thought they had taken Newt down over 10 years ago. Apparently not.


18 posted on 12/05/2011 9:46:00 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

So, what exactly did Newt do in the 90s that got him “taken down” in the first place?

I honestly don’t remember.


29 posted on 12/05/2011 9:48:21 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (Be careful of believing something just because you want it to be true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint

>> The Dems are getting nervous. They thought they had taken Newt down over 10 years ago. Apparently not. >>

Finally, had to get to reply 18 before someone got it. This is the translation of Pelosi-speak:

“Oh hell, Newt will embarrass us in the debates. Let me “warn” Republicans not to nominate him or we’re in trouble.”


30 posted on 12/05/2011 9:48:37 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint

“The Dems are getting nervous. They thought they had taken Newt down over 10 years ago. Apparently not.”

I have the same reservations about Newt as everyone else. One thing I am hopeful about though, is that he may have an axe to grind if and when he comes back. I do not read him as the total Stockholm Syndrome poster boy that McCain was and is.


62 posted on 12/05/2011 9:55:50 AM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson