[paudio]

Again, my issue is not whether he's guilty of cheating or not. My issue is his (and his team's) inability to anticipate and deal with such allegations after the first three. They should have looked at all possible attacks on that front, but obviously they didn't. His admission that the wife didn't know anything about the woman just buried his image as a faithful husband, as well as his campaign. Had he come cleaned to his wife a couple weeks ago, they could just laugh it off and move on--just like with the first three allegations. Instead, he looked like someone who got caught with hands in a cookie jar. In presidential race, consistency between image and message is very important.

[HiTech RedNeck]

It’s damned if he did, damned if he didn’t. If Herman Cain had a nutsy broad chasing his pants, he is only considerate to his wife to say nothing about it, as well as to say no to the nutsy broad.

[Sun]

“They should have looked at all possible attacks on that front, but obviously they didn’t. ..”

How did they know that women from the leftist machine would come out of the woodwork with lies?

Husbands and wives often don’t tell each other everything, but that doesn’t mean that they are cheating. I’ve done it myself but am very loyal, as is my husband.

Palin was also wrongfully accused of cheating on her husband, and she handled it with humor by saying: “Have you SEEN Todd?”

Call me crazy (some do), but I need EVIDENCE that Cain was having an affair.