[loucon]

Good, I wouldn't want you to go based on our dialog.

I don't need to look up the definition of alleged, or for that matter, acknowledged or documented.

the existence of documentation is irrelevant because he ADMITS doing it.

Do I interpret your meaning correctly as:

Whether a document exists or a document does not exist prior to its discovery, it has no relevance to the matter if in the matter one party alleges something and the other party acknowledges it as true?

[1rudeboy]

If you stipulate something to be true, you'd be a bonehead to allege (there's a word, for you) that it is false. In a court of law, you'd be prevented from doing so. This is not a court of law, I understand, this is a FR thread--where someone can write:

alleged 'payments' [I didn't notice the apostrophes, earlier]

simultaneously implying that the payments did not happen, and if they did, they are "alms" and not payments at all.

Alms are not payments--wrap your mind around that one. LOL