I want to make a specific point of NOT voting for this person when the primaries roll around to my state--just on the meritis of the way you have shoddily treated my and others' candidate here, Herman Cain, on this thread incessantly and elsewhere on Free Republic, under the ruse of "objectivity". The bottom line is that his candidacy offends some personal interest of yours in some way and I assume that is your support of another person and that perhaps your candidate cannot win on issues alone, but needs supporters like you to stoke the RINO fire of controversy and character asassination against candidate Cain. Please hurry and indicate your supported candidate so I can make note of that. Thanks again for your cooperation.
I’ll freely admit that I would vote for Cain in a heartbeat, and it doesn’t make what he did any less of a bonehead maneuver . . . and watching folks here dancing on the head of a pin is just plain amusing.
News flash, bucko - I was leaning towards Cain. Not sure who I lean towards now, I am in serious wait and see mode now.
And I am not quite sure how forming an opinion over an admission by Cain is treating him shoddily.
But go ahead, persist in your denial that this does not speak well of Cain and starts to allow doubt to creep in about his veracity.
I would still vote for Cain if he was the nominee as well, and would prefer him over Newt and Romney, in that order. He just went down a big notch IMO as the best choice for anti-Romney. At this point, I really have no idea who is. So I guess I’ll see what goes down over the next 2-3 weeks and if anyone can pick up their game and offer a substantive challenge to Newt and Romney.