To: Free ThinkerNY
Newt is more liberal than Mittens, yet for some reason many FReepers give him a free pass.
5 posted on
12/01/2011 7:23:17 PM PST by
NakedRampage
(Puttin' the "stud" in Bible study)
To: NakedRampage
As others point out, Gingrich had a 90% conservative rating. And Ron Paul is a libertarian.
The only reason Paul is attacking Newt is because of the lead that Newt obtained. For Paul to be relevent. He needs a close race and ultimately a split convention.
To: NakedRampage
Newt is more liberal than Mittens, yet for some reason many FReepers give him a free pass.
What a whopper. Mitt governed as a Massachusetts liberal, bringing us gay marriage, government-mandated health care, and was to the left of Ted Kennedy on abortion. All Newt did was LEAD conservative Republican Revolution in 1994, authoring the brilliant strategy behind the Contract with America that swept the GOP into power and stopped Clinton's liberal agenda, including Hillary Care dead in its tracks. The GOP House went on to act on every last piece of the Contract with America. You are delusional if you think Mitt is more conservative than Newt. What HAVE you been smoking?!
14 posted on
12/01/2011 7:37:35 PM PST by
GLDNGUN
To: NakedRampage
yet for some reason many FReepers give him a free pass.It's the whole "lesser of evils" thing so long as their is an "R" after the name.
To: NakedRampage
I don’t agree with that at all. Newt has his flaws no doubt, but at least he can fight. I don’t trust Mitt to stand up and fight for us.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson