Posted on 11/30/2011 2:21:52 PM PST by hiram569
Last night Alevda King went on CNN to defend Herman Cain. She says she’s known him since 2000 and that he is absolutely not a “skirt chaser”.
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
Not yet. The hardware required to block the scum malware from Examiner is blocking the stairs.
Perhaps you should "write" somewhere else.
Like Free Republic.
Or is that eighteen dollars a quarter really such a life changer for you?
You really ARE a dick aren’t you?
To think an internet website is keeping you from getting out of daddy’s basement..... I guess I shouldn’t be surprised.
I’m sure you’re bitter that you used to be able to make those eighteen dollars much quicker.
The ravages of age, though.. and the streets are tougher.
I applaud your efforts. Mind the crazies and use the clinics.
I would tell you that the green of jealousy doesn’t suit you, but why throw pearls to swine?
They turned down your application didn’t they?
Lol given the lack of substance behind your otherwise pedantic insults, that is no surprise.
You're the one who "writes" at Examiner. You tell me.
>> “Why doesn’t he defend himself before the American people by GOING ON THE OFFENSE and demand specifics and evidence that can be weighted and disproved if false?” <<
.
If you were a tad smarter, you would know that a negative cannot be proven.
Anything he does beyond denial and continuing to campaign just plays into the mediots hands.
>> “And Cain’s accusers are attractive?” <<
.
To Humble...
>> “The rats would love to use this kind of crap against our NOMINEE...using it now would be stupid.” <<
.
Not in Cain’s case. - He has them beat if he’s the nominee. They know full well that the Gimmiecrat plantation cannot survive a Cain candidacy.
The rest are no worry to the dems.
Memory problems along with low reading skills too eh?
Contemptuous personal comments aside, a lie if it's specific enough can be disproved.
Better put, a lie, if it contains enough specifics, can be countered with evidence to the contrary.
This isn’t a court room where evidence is judged objectively; its the Axelrod propaganda ministry, AKA the nooz me-da-yuh.
Cain has no power over the criminal editorialization.
Humble has made it plain that he is deeply envious of those that can express themselves in writing, and have a solid catalogue of blogged articles.
His best is a whole sentence now and then.
Yeah, I’ve always wanted to be a blogger.
Everybody knows that.
Actually, a national election (or any free democratic election for that matter) is basically a public trial “in the court of public opinion.”
That is precisely why your original statement was nonsense.
You argue with rude personal contempt and random assertions. I think I'm done.
Did you mean that you are done being an anti-Cain troll?
Or just done being deflective?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.