To: istandwithsarah
Odds are against it. One woman, maybe. Two, I guess it’s possible. But three who came out with their face and name to the accusations, and others who still want to remain anonymous. That’s just stretching credibility beyond what I’m willing to entertain. The man’s a bounder.
53 posted on
11/28/2011 6:00:39 PM PST by
MizSterious
(Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
To: MizSterious
Are you willing to entertain the possibility that the Democrats are behind this? After all, if any of these allegations were true, the Democrats should have waited until AFTER Cain secures the nomination.
To: MizSterious
But three who came out with their face and name to the accusations,
Wasn't it two. Lick I believe they counted 2x - once as anonymous and then she came out. Remember how one wanted them all to have a conference - it never happened because the 'all' were the two. That's the way I understood it anyway. And the first one - the company gave severance pay to. Saying she got money was misleading to imply she got something because her accusations were true. She was the whiner who wanted to work from home and presently in the Barry admin. Those two accusations were so quick, I immediately dismissed them. This one - I don't know what is going on. I can't tell a guy from a girl or girl from guy.
115 posted on
11/28/2011 8:09:01 PM PST by
presently no screen name
(If it's not in God's Word, don't pass it off as truth! That's satan's job)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson