Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Pan_Yan.
...it may not let NATO use its territory to supply troops in Afghanistan if the alliance doesn't seriously consider its objections to a U.S.-led missile shield for Europe...
No problem -- we may start using Turkish bases to supply the Chechens and other Muzzie independence movements. Problem solved. Oh, and still build and deploy the missiles shield. Those a-holes had a chance (more than one) to agree to Reagan's proposals in the 1980s, now they'll have to live with the consequences of their own stupidity.


14 posted on 11/28/2011 7:18:05 PM PST by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Well, disallowing one to use its territory to supply troops somewhere and starting to supply terrorists are not the things of the same kind.

In fact it is a sovereign right of every nation to decide if they are allowing foreign military transit or not and most nations are disallowing by default which can’t be considered as a hostile act under any law.

Supporting jihadi terrorists is an illegal act in its nature and contradicts all the American interests as well.


15 posted on 11/28/2011 7:38:07 PM PST by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson