Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Popman

I think Obama would agree and it would be mnuch ado about nothing. The Cain / Newt “debate” turned out to be a love-fest.

I think Newt is making a mistake by bragging about his debating skills. He comes across as a blowhard and unnecessarily raises expectations. All Obama has to do to win is survive and all Newt has to do to blow it is make some little gaffe.


11 posted on 11/27/2011 12:31:50 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

-——The Cain / Newt “debate” turned out to be a love-fest.———

You think Newt would debate Obama the same way he debated Cain ?

I think not....Newt really nothing to lose in debating Cain

Newt wants to debate Obama without a moderator, just a timer....

Obama would have everything to lose and nothing to gain in that type of debate....


13 posted on 11/27/2011 12:53:15 PM PST by Popman (Obama is God's curse upon the land....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk
The Cain / Newt “debate” turned out to be a love-fest.

No kidding. So what's your point. That debate has nothing to do with Gingrich debating Obama.

Cain and Gingrich are personal friends. The purpose of that debate was to get some ideas out, see where they went and test that debating style for the future.

42 posted on 11/27/2011 5:40:03 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson