You’re not doing a thing to address the 10th amendment or federalism.
I am not so certain what governors of different states might do in certain situations. I remember reading governor Reagan was criticized by some conservatives when he was in California for allowing some unsavory characters to remain on faculties at college campuses, when he had the apparent power to remove them.
I think those states rights ideas are very important principles to stick by, and you’ve merely glossed over them. To each his/her own, I guess.
I will be working to defeat Hussein. His agenda is the worst of any candidate.
Equating Hussein with any of the Republican candidates, if that is indeed what your’e doing, is as wrong as equating night and day.
It's sad that you scream about the 10th amendment but you don't address Romney absolutely shredding the 2nd amendment, disregarding a child's right to life so far as to use tax money to pay for their murders, and everything else he did to spit on conservatism & the constitution. His record IS as liberal as any run of the mill liberal Democrat's. Whether you want to accept that or not, facts are facts. If I listed all the things on his record and all the positions he supported while hiding his name & party, you'd think you were reading a Democratic candidate's "achievements."
Again, he wasn't shouting "states rights" before he was governor and already held all those liberal positions outside of Massachusetts. He only SAYS he's a conservative now. He says anything he thinks it'll take to get elected. The man is a spineless liar.
He'll be back to being liberal Mitt in the general election because he thinks that can win him some moderate votes, with the assumption that the conservative base will all fall in line & vote for him like lemmings. I guarantee he thinks this will happen. And it won't.
Voting blindly because the person is a Republican in name only is not only moralless, it's also dangerous. A socialist by any other name is still a socialist. RINOs are the enemy from within.