Oh my.
I had to stop reading. It was around the line where he wrote we don’t have to worry about Romney being exposed for having a DUI charge.
Actually, he has a DUD charge: Driving Under Dog. Putting the sick pooch on the roof was an uncommonly heartless act.
But it doesn’t approach protecting the so-called “right” to kill a baby.
We have enormous reason to reject Mitt Romney. Mine don’t include Mormonism, or an aversion to well-educated candidates (is he? really?)
Yes, he is vetted. And found wanting. Wanting of core, of principles, of integrity.
Unfortunately, I’m going to have to hold my nose and take the full dose of your article, Mr. Hanson. Because now I have misgivings about you!
But darn good post!