To: xzins
When America finally realize that we are not permitted by law to get rid of anchor babies, who are legitimate American citizens, then theyll realize that were not getting rid of their parents, and by extension, their grandparents.
Sorry, but the ersatz kritocrats have not rewritten the Constitution here, yet. The Supreme Court case, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, is about the children of legal immigrants. Congress can strip citizenship from each one of the criminal beneficiaries.
55 posted on
11/23/2011 11:37:34 PM PST by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: rmlew
Despite what you say, Anwar al Awlaki was a US citizen, an anchor baby. So was the recently born child of a Mexican drug lord whose young wife crossed the border just for that purpose.
The law currently makes anchor babies inevitable; they are US Citizens.
And for anyone to say, “conress can strip” that away is acknowledgement that NOW things are as I say they are.
And congress cannot punish people by using a law passed after the fact: ex post facto laws are prohibited by the Constitution. That means that all anchor babies now citizens will be citizens their entire lives. It cannot be taken from them.
65 posted on
11/24/2011 4:49:46 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson