Perry is more conservative - mainly because Newt is way farther out on this issue than Perry, not because Perry’s position is what it should be.
Newt is dangerous because he is a chameleon.
Newt is dangerous because he is a chameleon.
What difference does that comparison make? Perry is equally dangerous to America. At least he has a long specific track record for us to base his campaign promises and rhetoric on and his likely future performance as President, so we can see if the rhetoric matches his established record. And I agree that Newty is as or is more dangerous as well.
With Newty he reminds me of the pol who wets his finger and thrusts it up into the political winds to see what direction to take. Maybe not as bad as 'Obama Lite' Romney but cut from the same cloth, the RINO cloth that is.
Oh, and Perry is no conservative as far as I'm concerned. He bleeds blue blood just as Newty does. One difference as I see it is that Newty has a real thick RINO crust, thicker than Perry's.