To: STARWISE
And Now for the Rest of the Story
No delegates will be awarded in the Mo primary. It's a beauty contest. The state Republican Party will hold caucuses in March to award delegates.
Not making excuses for Newt. Just simply trying to give the full story.
To: FreeReign
Yeah, I said that up thread,
but I still think lost momentum
could be a real factor that a
candidate would want to avoid.
36 posted on
11/22/2011 7:11:45 PM PST by
STARWISE
(The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
To: FreeReign
What a spoilsport you are. Just when all the infants were getting their didies in a twist to leak on daddy Gingrich, you come along and remind them of what idiot children they all are. Bad adult, bad!.
To: FreeReign
Amazing how many people don’t read the posts but instead just post their blather. Thanks for setting things straight.
52 posted on
11/22/2011 7:57:15 PM PST by
sanjuanbob
(Festina Lente)
To: FreeReign; sickoflibs; Godzilla; ejonesie22; Elsie; T Minus Four
So the people don’t have a voice in MO? Does the party take into account who wins the primary?
Sounds like Romney’s Missouri ancestors to me.
60 posted on
11/22/2011 9:55:08 PM PST by
reaganaut
(Romney IS Obama - just 'white and delightsome' 2 Nephi 30:6)
To: FreeReign
What’s your point? You may not think your making excuses, but at the very least your mittigating (sorry, I couldn’t resist that).
To: FreeReign
If no delegates from from it, then it could've been a waste of $1000 probably best used elsewhere.
I've little understood these states doing both primaries and caucuses while only one process decides the delegates.
95 posted on
11/24/2011 1:27:47 PM PST by
newzjunkey
(Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson