No, not at all. I got no problem with your choices. The point I was trying to make is that it’s easy to say I’d cut but difficult to say we’ll cut... that’s all. Sorry, didn’t mean to be mysterious.
I wrote 'I'd', hoping others would agree with the choices. To me, 'we'd' would have been presumptuous.
Perhaps I should have been less cryptic. My point was there is an incredible amount of money that hopefully we'd agree to cut from the budget first, from places our 'illustrious' politicians never mention. In fact I would love to see Ron Pauls's
proposed budget as a starting point for discussion.