Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww

I saw it more as a genuine conviction since Perry is a totally committed pro-life person. More than a ‘safe bet’ or a good ploy but maybe I’m just too trusting.


275 posted on 11/21/2011 8:41:42 PM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]


To: altura

I agree Perry is very pro-life....could have been why he zeroed in on that as a reason. Even so it was a safe bet to go there and not tread otherwise water....same with Pakistan...though they tired to get him to so speak about it...he was also right not to tread heavily on Pakistan since they are nuclear, which changes the equation of how you deal with them especially since they are basically a islamic country.

Although I have another candidate I support over Perry I do think it’s possible he can recover from his past bloopers, so to speak, Newt pulled out of his slump in a couple months and started on the upswing, there’s just no way to tell how this is going to shake out so I do watch Perry....though my concerns remain troublesome in voting for him. Still he may be the candidate that ends up on top...and beyond measure when it comes to Obama.


291 posted on 11/21/2011 9:12:16 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson