Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dominick

I agree.

Now explain why saving lives now is violating principle.


96 posted on 11/21/2011 7:37:33 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

I am sorry I was trying to agree.

Every action that changes a heart and makes the correct position understood helps to promote the defense of the rights of the unborn. For far too long we have played political games, and conceded the ground of prolife means anti-abortion. Bachmann going after Gingrich serves nothing.

Bachmann provides no leadership here. Romney provides no leadership. I am sad to say, they all fall short. Until you put the question in terms even a liberal can understand, the right of life for every person, the task is much harder.

Every question must be framed in terms of securing the freedom of the unborn to life, I am not happy with the mincing of words in terms of “feeling pain”, but I am sure the children who survive will not regard the distinction as important.

Incremental approaches must continue, but we must also drive home the central issue. Bachmann does neither.


107 posted on 11/21/2011 8:37:05 AM PST by Dominick ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson