Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
The guy will wind up owning that company.

Years ago a guy in Michigan sued ( and won ) the state over being required to wear a hunting license ‘back tag’ while hunting. He argued that it was like the Nazis putting a tattoo on Jews.

Today what was once common in many states, wearing a hunting ‘back tag’ isn't required in any state I know of.

In Michigan at least, you can't be required to accept a license plate for your car with the number 666 in it anywhere.

The guy wins big on this one.

12 posted on 11/19/2011 12:32:28 PM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Beagle8U
The guy will wind up owning that company.

He won't own squat. That's the downside of living in a right-to-work state. They don't even have to give a reason but not wearing a sticker is reason enough.

33 posted on 11/19/2011 1:24:12 PM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson