Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dools0007world

Newt is why we won a majority in the 1990s...him and Rush.

He ain’t perfect, but he is better by far than Hussein.


23 posted on 11/19/2011 6:02:06 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Recovering_Democrat

You are right about the 1990s.

Rush has been a national treasure and Newt was the right man at the right time.

The question will be whether Newt could be kept to the straight and narrow now.

His greatest advantage as a candidate might be that he knows the press hates him, and he despises them in return, and at present he isn’t afraid to tell them so.

The day Newt will be sunk, and any potential supporters along with him, is the day that he once again starts making overtures to the enemy, including the media, the libs, the whole Washington machine.

The problem is that he has done it again and again.

Newt, like Obama, has to see himself as the smartest guy in the room. This leads him to propose dramatic “solutions,” some of which are anti-government and some the essence of big government.

Contrast Newt in the debate mopping the floor with CBS’ Scott Pelley and Newt last May sucking up to NBC’s David Gregory by ambushing Paul Ryan (a rival smart guy in the room).

I really like Newt as a candidate. As president?...well, it would never be boring.


87 posted on 11/19/2011 9:06:41 AM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson